Share

Contracts show how SA govt was ‘bullied’ into unfair Covid-19 vaccine deals

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
President Cyril Ramaphosa gets a Covid-19 vaccine jab at Khayelitsha District Hospital in Cape Town.
President Cyril Ramaphosa gets a Covid-19 vaccine jab at Khayelitsha District Hospital in Cape Town.
GCIS

NEWS


A multi-stakeholder group led by the Health Justice Initiative (HJI) has found that the South African government paid millions of rands for Covid-19 vaccines from global pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers under unfavourable terms and conditions, compared to Western nations.

The HJI, a nonprofit organisation that advocates for a more inclusive and fair public and global health system, analysed four Covid-19 vaccine procurement contracts government signed with big pharma companies like Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer.

The findings, which were shared on Tuesday during a media briefing, show that government was "bullied" into signing away its sovereignty and agreeing to the terms for vaccine contracts that were one-sided and unethical via "ransom negotiations".

READ: Court orders health department to hand over all Covid vaccine contract info to NPO

The HJI won a legal challenge last month in the Pretoria High Court to compel the national department of health to hand over the Covid-19 vaccine contracts to the organisation in the interest of transparency and accountability. The department had opposed the HJI's application to access the documents through the Promotion of Access to Information Act, but it did not appeal the high court ruling. Instead, the department handed over the contracts to HJI last Friday.

Terms and conditions one-sided

According to the information obtained by the nonprofit organisation, the terms and conditions of the contracts are “overwhelmingly” one-sided and favour multinational corporations.

The HJI said in a statement:

The contracts contain unusually hefty demands and conditions, including secrecy, a lack of transparency, and very little leverage against late or no delivery of supplies or inflated prices - resulting in gross profiteering and the inability to plan properly in a pandemic.

The documents revealed that none of the contracts signed with pharmaceutical manufacturers were under South African legal jurisdiction. For example, the agreement between US-based J&J and the South African government was conducted under English and Welsh law.

READ: Health department complies with court order to hand over Covid-19 vaccine contracts

Compared to Western nations, South Africa was liable for payments of at least $734 million (over R14 billion), including advance payments of almost $95 million, with no guarantees of timely delivery.

J&J charged South Africa $10 a dose, which is 15% ($1.50 a dose) more than the company charged the EU and about 25% more than the estimated not-for-profit price. For an order of at least 30 000 000 doses, the total bill will have reached $30 000 000. South Africa was required to pay a non-refundable down payment of $27.5 million. 

The HJI said:

The country was forced to overpay for vaccines, paying 33% more than the African Union price for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and paying the Serum Institute of India 2.5 times more for a generic version of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine compared to the United Kingdom.

“The Group analysed all the documents handed over to HJI since 31 August 2023, and found that the agreements placed people and governments in the global south in the unenviable position of having to secure scarce supplies in a global emergency (2020-2022) with unusually hefty demands and conditions, including secrecy, a lack of transparency, and very little leverage against late or no delivery of supplies or inflated prices - resulting in gross profiteering.”

SA's sovereignty

The HJI and its partners have accused government of bartering away its sovereignty in exchange for scarce vaccine supplies during the Covid-19 pandemic, describing this as “unconscionable, imperial and unethical”. 

The group’s analysis sets out why this type of 'take-it-or-leave-it' contracting signals a dangerous precedent for future pandemic readiness measures and systems and why this level of bullying, secrecy, and lack of transparency has no place in any democracy.
 

The director of HJI, Fatima Hassan, has expressed concern over the deference to and fear of powerful pharmaceutical companies by government.

She said:

It shows how much power was put into the hands of private sector actors and how few options governments had, when acting alone, in the middle of a pandemic.
 

“The contracts reveal the phenomenal power that pharmaceutical companies wielded in negotiations. In our scramble for desperately needed vaccines, South Africa was forced to hand over unimaginable sums of money for overpriced vaccine doses.

“We were bullied into unfair and undemocratic terms in contracts that were totally one-sided. Put simply, pharmaceutical companies held us to ransom. And we must ask: did they do it to other countries too?”

The second batch of documents - which includes the negotiation meeting outcomes, minutes and correspondence - will be shared publicly next month.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Peter “Mashata” Mabuse is the latest celebrity to be murdered by criminals. What do you think must be done to stem the tide of serious crime in South Africa?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Police minister must retire
27% - 64 votes
Murderers deserve life in jail
13% - 31 votes
Bring back the death penalty
59% - 139 votes
Vote